心理計量研究投入者眾

最近看到林主任與吳菁宜主任發表多篇心理計量論文

1.         Wu CY, Fu T, Lin KC, Feng CT, Hsieh KP, Yu HW, Lin CH, Hsieh CJ, Ota H. Assessing the streamlined wolf motor function test as an outcome measure for stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010

2.         Lin KC, Chuang LL, Wu CY, Hsieh YW, Chang WY. Responsiveness and validity of three dexterous function measures in stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47:563-571

3.         Lin KC, Fu T, Wu CY, Hsieh YW, Chen CL, Lee PC. Psychometric comparisons of the stroke impact scale 3.0 and stroke-specific quality of life scale. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:435-443

4.         Lin KC, Fu T, Wu CY, Wang YH, Liu JS, Hsieh CJ, Lin SF. Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the stroke impact scale in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24:486-492

5.         Lin KC, Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Chen CL, Jang Y, Liu JS. Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the wolf motor function test in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:429-434

6.         Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Lin KC, Chang YF, Chen CL, Liu JS. Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2009;40:1386-1391

Looks interesting! 

林主任的最近1篇是簡化評估工具，結果顯示簡化工具之心理計量特性與原始版 [相當]，因此支持簡化版之 clinical utility。 

我已發表多篇類似論文，但最近比較少了，因為觀點改了。簡版的臨床效用，除了節省時間，但因還是會喪失一些評估訊息的，所以簡版用於研究OK，但臨床就須考量 得失 了。